Connect with us

News

Lowest form of Journalism

Published

on

indias-daughter
Spread the love

                 Lowest form of Journalism

india's daughter

The excerpted interview from the documentary film India’s Daughter with December 16 rape convicts Mukesh Singh, after creating much shock, awe and disgust seems to have landed in a controversy. Home Minister Rajnath Singh reportedly sought an explanation from Tihar Jail authorities about how Mukesh Singh was allowed to give an interview. The minister, according to sources, is upset “over a rapist being interviewed by BBC London and NDTV.

 

Meanwhile, the interview itself has divided people on Twitter. While some felt the interview underscores the pervasiveness of victim-blaming, others wondered what the film achieves by giving space and time to someone who obviously suffers from a sick mind set. Singh in the interview says: “She [Jyoti] should just be silent and allow the rape. Then they would have dropped her off after ‘doing her’ and only hit the boy.”

Here is the interview Singh gave to the channels: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31698154

It’s to be noted here that there are certain ethics to be followed while reporting on such sensitive cases, which involves an incident which had made people go out on streets. What’s the message the channels are trying to give by broadcasting the views of a rape accused?

Every Journalist is taught laws and ethics in their Journalism schools, which they’re expected to follow when it comes to reporting. Is this interview to create a fear among women in India? Nothing can go low than this.

According to the reports, of Times Now, “NDTV’s management will soon take call on whether the interview should be broadcasted or not, after itsuproar on social media.”

 

 

Tags: #NirbhayaInsulted #Nirbhaya #IndiasDaughter #NDTVShamesNirbhaya #BBC

15 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Aniruddha Ghosh

    March 4, 2015 at 4:41 AM

    In which journalism school did Arnab Goswami take his lessons ? Arnab Goswami lecturing on ethics ? What a joke !!!

    • Mehul Thakkar

      March 4, 2015 at 8:30 AM

      It is not Arnab Goswami posting articles on this website. It are the writers of Headlinesoftoday.com writing here.

    • sam

      December 12, 2015 at 8:21 PM

      it is better than your leftist corrupt sickular education….khangressi traitor

  2. Satish Purohit

    March 5, 2015 at 1:29 PM

    Well-written article! We have inadvertently provided fodder to anti-India ‘atrocity pedallers’ abroad by allowing media into the jail. This should not have happened. Rape is a serious issue that societies across the world grapple with. This case may have occurred in India but the problem exists everywhere. But these societies need poverty porn and ‘discrimination literature’ and we have their slaves in the media to do the job for them.

    • Mehul Thakkar

      March 5, 2015 at 3:16 PM

      I appreciate your acceptance on the writing. At the same time I would say, That allowing the media should not be an issue, but allowing the media to shoot or make a commercial documentary on such a heinous crimes is something which should not be allowed.

      • Nidhi Shah

        March 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM

        And Why should the media not be allowed to shoot a henious crime like this?

        • Mehul Thakkar

          March 5, 2015 at 6:34 PM

          Because they don’t shoot a documentary, but they shoot a dramatised Bollywood touch documentary. (Commercial purpose you see)

          • Nidhi Shah

            March 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM

            Ummm no. I don’t think so this was anything near to a dramatized Bollywood documentary.

          • Mehul Thakkar

            March 6, 2015 at 10:30 AM

            You’re free to think whatever you feel. Its a democratic country but the fact remains is, it was dramatised because without it you don’t feel the emotions. You should read the filmmakers critics on the documentary.

          • Nidhi Shah

            March 6, 2015 at 5:01 PM

            Okaayy so you’re trying to say is a person can only get feelings for a raped woman or anything else for that context by watching a “dramatized documentary” and not by reading such henious news in the newspapers?
            Yes I will definitely.

          • Mehul Thakkar

            March 7, 2015 at 5:44 AM

            Do you even know— How much a dramatic documentary can make money? I’m not saying anything its you assuming things. The way in which media commercialization is done is something which you should read and I’ve read about it and so am I being a critic about it. You’re free to assume and think whatever you want to.

          • Nidhi Shah

            March 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM

            Of course I do.
            Ok

  3. Jagruti Verma

    March 5, 2015 at 6:11 PM

    Well… You do make a point! But I personally feel it wasn’t wrong to interview a rapist… because maybe we needed that insight! I felt very sad.. almost crying like and then wanted to curse him so bad! but then I realized that… maybe I need to know that… to know how bad a person can think! Maybe knowing can help us eradicate it…. Maybe knowing can help us understand why it happens at all!
    The thing I am really against in the documentary is the fact they dramatized the topic to give a commercial documentary rather than a documentary!

    • Mehul Thakkar

      March 5, 2015 at 6:37 PM

      Dramatisation is the whole point of people being against it. We won’t have opposed it if they would have done something like a documentary in real how its supposed to be.

      • Jagruti Verma

        March 5, 2015 at 6:55 PM

        “Is this interview to create a fear among women in India?” – Trust me, the word Rape is enough. You don’t need an interview of a rapist to do that.
        “Nothing can go low than this.” – True. Dramatization of such a thing for commercial purpose is an act which must be condemned! True! But there have been far worse dramatization of Rape and the related taboos in various media platforms…. Is it right to condemn a documentary… yes… even a commercial one..which did more good than bad? That is.. if you agree it did any good at all….

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Europe

Portugal Parliament Vote to Allow Euthanasia

Published

on

Spread the love

On Thursday, 230-member Republic Assembly of Portugal parliament votes to legalise euthanasia and medically-assisted suicide for terminally sick people. This vote has made Portugal one of the few countries in the world that have permitted the procedures, however, the country’s president might try to block the legislation.

The Portugal parliament approved five such right-to-die bills each with comfortable margin while several people gathered outside parliament building protesting the measure chanting “Sim a Vida” as in their opinion Euthanasia does not end suffering it ends life.

On the other hand, things were tensed inside the parliament considering the historical weight of the situation. Each member was called in alphabetical order to state their vote on each of the five bills instead of electronic voting. Usually, such lengthy method is followed only for landmark decisions such as a declaration of war or impeachment.

After these bills were passed few lawmakers decided to take photographs of the electronic screen on the wall announcing the results using their smartphones. The bills got approved by margins between 28 and 41 votes.

Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa who was known to be critical about euthanasia could try and veto the law but parliament can overturn the veto with a second vote for approval as the Portuguese president doesn’t have many executive powers the law could still remain but he may ask the Constitutional Court to review the legislation.

Euthanasia is a process where the doctor directly gives fatal drugs to a patient which is legal in countries like Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Medically assisted suicide is a process where the patients take the lethal drug under medical supervision which is permitted in few states in the USA. Similar motion is also set in the socialist-led coalition government in Spain where they plan to take all legislative steps required to legalise euthanasia.

Continue Reading

Headlines

Who is Debbie Abraham and Why is she deported from India?

Published

on

Spread the love

Debbie Abraham is a British MP and Labor Party, leader. She is critical of the government’s decisions on Kashmir under Article 370. Yesterday her e-visa was revoked due to her involvement in anti-India activities. She had reached Delhi on a two-day visit. Harpreet Uppal, who accompanied her, told the news agency that her valid Indian visa was rejected by the authorities at the airport. Officials did not give any reason for the cancellation of Abraham’s visa, while the visa was valid until October 2020. At the same time, a Home Ministry official, on the condition of anonymity, said that Abraham did not have a valid visa to travel. Hence she was barred from entering India. She was put on the UK return flight from Delhi Airport. 

The British MP stated “When he came back he was very rude and aggressive shouting at me to ‘come with me’. I told him not to speak to me like that and was then taken to a cordoned-off area marked as a Deportee Cell. He then ordered me to sit down and I refused. I didn’t know what they might do or where else they may take me, so I wanted people to see me,”

Although she has justified in a twitter post that e-visa has been issued by the Indian Government.

Sources in the government said, “It is the prerogative of the country to grant a visa or e-visa to any person, to cancel it or to cancel its application. Her e-business visa was canceled by the government on 14 February 2020, in view of activities against India’s interests. Abraham was also informed by the government about the cancellation of his visa. ”

The politics heated over it as one of the Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi supported sending Debbie Abraham back from the airport. Singhvi tweeted on Tuesday – “It was necessary to stop Debbie from coming to India because she works as a representative of Pakistan, not an MP.” She is associated with the Government of Pakistan and the ISI. It is necessary to thwart attempts to attack India’s autonomy.

 Congress leader Shashi Tharoor on the other hand given a statement “that it is being said on behalf of the British MP that he had a valid visa, yet he was not allowed to enter India”. They believe that this has happened because of their views on Kashmir.

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor further said that I think it is unfortunate. By not allowing such people to enter India, we will be considered a country with a narrow mind and intolerant, which is not right for our country, there is diversity in our country. We have the ability to tolerate negative attitudes of people coming from outside.

Continue Reading

Headlines

After 17-years-of-long legal battle women get equal rights at the Indian army breaking the stereotype 

Published

on

Spread the love

The Supreme Court said in an important decision on Monday that all those women officers who want to opt for this option should be given a permanent commission in the army within three months. The court termed the Centre’s plea as citing physical abilities and social norms behind not giving women command posts. The judgment was delivered by a bench of Justice DY Chandrachud

After this decision of the Supreme Court, now women in the army have got equal rights with male officers. Till now only male soldiers who served in the Army for 14 years in the Short Service Commission (SSC) were getting the option of permanent commission, but women did not have this right. Although, Women officers in the Air Force and Navy are getting a permanent commission.

What really occurred?

in 2003, Babita Punia was the first woman lawyer to petition the Delhi High Court in this case. After that, nine women officers filed separate petitions in the High Court till 2009 on the same issue. In 2010, the Delhi High Court ruled on these petitions and ordered permanent commission of women in the army. The High Court had said, “It is clarified that all those women officers who have not reached the age of retirement should be given permanent commission.” They should also be given benefits like promotions. We are not doing women any favors, we are giving them their constitutional rights. ”

What evoked the situation?

Nine years after the High Court’s decision, in February 2019, the government made a policy of giving permanent commission to women officers in 10 departments of the army but said that only women officers who have been in service since March 2019 will get the benefit. In this way, those women were deprived of permanent commission, who fought a long legal battle on this issue. The Center had filed a petition in the Supreme Court, arguing that male soldiers would not be ready to take orders from female officers.

Three most important things about the decision of the Supreme Court which has been made today 

Permanent Commission: All women officers under Short Service Commission will be entitled to permanent commission. The Supreme Court has said that women officers who have served less than 14 years and above under the Short Service Commission should be given the chance of permanent commission.

Combat Role: The Supreme Court has left the decision on the government and the army to give Combat Roll to women. The Supreme Court said, ‘Deployment of women in the combat roles directly involved in the war is a matter of policy. The Delhi High Court also said the same. So the government will have to think about it.

Command posting: The Supreme Court has said, ‘It is absurd to completely ban women officers from not giving a command posting in the Army and is against the right to equal. Women should get the right to command posting. Command posting means posting leading a unit, corps or command.

 Strict comments of Supreme Court told Center to be preferential and asked to change the mindset

Unique decisions of the Center: The Supreme Court said, ‘The policy decisions of the Central Government regarding the deployment of women officers have been very unique. After the High Court’s decision, the Center should have given permanent commission to women in the army. The Center has shown bias by not giving permanent commission to women officers.

Disturbing arguments: Due to physical limitations and social norms, the Center’s plea of ​​not giving permanent commission to women officers is disturbing. Such pleas cannot be accepted at all.

Need to change mentality: Women officers should be given permanent commission in the Army. In the past, women officers have shown bravery for the country. Even after 70 years of British rule, the government needs to change the mindset to end gender discrimination in the armed forces.

Humiliation of women and the army: Doubting not only the women but also the army, will be an insult to the abilities of women regarding achievements and roles in the army.

The Center did not pay heed to the verdict: In 2010, the Delhi High Court allowed a permanent commission for women officers. 2 September 2011 The Supreme Court also made it clear that the High Court’s decision will not have stayed. Despite this, the Center did not implement it for a decade and did not listen to the decisions of the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court.

Advocate Meenakshi Lekhi, who has pleaded on behalf of women officers in this case, said – this is a brilliant decision of the court. The court has implemented a permanent commission and reprimanded the authorities for not wanting to implement it. Army Lieutenant Colonel Seema Singh said that this is a progressive and historic decision. This will give women a chance to compete.

People on the internet are celebrating the Supreme Court’s verdict on the position of female officers in the army. 

 

Continue Reading

Headlines

PM flags off “Kashi Mahakal Express” from Varanasi.

Published

on

kashi_mahakal_express
Spread the love

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday flagged off the third private train operated by Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) between Varanasi and Indore. PM flagged off Kashi Mahakal Express via video conferencing from Varanasi. Till now IRCTC has already successfully launched two Private trains i.e Tejas Express trains on New Delhi-Lucknow and Mumbai-Ahmedabad routes.

The new Kashi Mahakal Express will connect three places — Jyotirlinga-Omkareshwar (near Indore in Madhya Pradesh), Mahakaleshwar (Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh) and Kashi Vishwanath (Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh). The private train will also connect industrial and educational hub of Indore, and Bhopal.

Varanasi-Indore Kashi Mahakal Express will depart from Varanasi at 3:15 pm every Sunday and will reach Indore at 9:40 am the next day. Indore-Varanasi Express will depart from Indore at 10:55 am every Monday and reach Varanasi at 5:00 am the next day. The train will halt at Ujjain, Sant Hirdaram Nagar, Bina, Jhansi, Kanpur and Allahabad stations in both directions.

Like the previous IRCTC private trains, the Kashi Mahakal Express will also follow a dynamic fare structure. One-way journey from Varanasi to Indore in Kashi Mahakal Express will cost Rs 1,951 inclusive of four meals. It is worth mentioning that the Indore-Varanasi Kashi Mahakal Express will be the first private train that will run overnight and for a comfortable long-distance journey, the train will feature a host of facilities.

IRCTC will serve vegetarian food onboard. Passengers will enjoy housekeeping services, on-board security services and bedrolls. Passengers will also get complimentary insurance of Rs 10 lakh.

The train will have an advance reservation period of 120 days and will only have general and foreign tourist quota. The current booking will be available to the passengers on the platform after preparation of first chart, four hours to five minutes before the scheduled departure of the train.

Continue Reading

Headlines

Will building a 400-meter long wall hide the truth of poverty in India from President Trump?

Published

on

Spread the love

On February 24-25 US President Donald Trump is scheduled to visit India. He will be attending the ‘Kem Chom Trump’ (How are you, Trump) program at Ahmedabad, India. Prior to it, in terms of preparations, a 400-meter-long and seven-feet-high wall is being constructed by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation in order to prevent the US leader from getting a glimpse of a slum situated next to the road from Ahmedabad Airport to Indira Bridge. On the other hand, contrary to the situation the Corporation is also fixing the path from Ahmedabad Airport to the Sardar Patel Motera Stadium. The slum district houses an estimated 800 families.

  Image Source: Google

According to media sources, Speaking on the situation a senior government official said: “the wall is being built for security reasons, and not to conceal the slum district”. The government official also conceded that the wall was part of a “beautification and cleanliness” drive.

On the other hand, as told to Reuters the contractor said that he is building it as the government “did not want the slum to be seen” when Trump passes by on the ride in from Ahmedabad’s airport. On a condition of not revealing the name the contractor also said, “I’ve been ordered to build a wall as soon as possible, over 150 masons are working round-the-clock to finish the project,”.

Also, Mayor Bijal Patel said that “I don’t know about it”.

The new construction of the wall made People living there very angry. According to a resident, who lives in this slum, says that “till now green cloth was put here but now a wall is being built up. If the government is ashamed of the poor, then concrete steps should be taken to remove poverty and instead of building walls in order to hide the reality. Now our homes will be surrounded by this wall, due to which the air, water will stop coming. Even here there is no sewer system, nor electricity. We have to live in the dark.

Some slum-dwellers whose homes will be cordoned off by the wall in Ahmedabad also said that “the government was wasting tax-payer money to hide the poor”.

In the visit, Modi and Trump will come to Ahmedabad from Delhi. The two leaders will reach the Motera Stadium via helicopter from the airport. After the program, Trump will fly to the airport directly by helicopter. Probably from here, he will leave for America. Apart from ‘Chem Chom Trump’, Trump is also expected to visit Sabarmati Ashram. They can go to Gandhi Ashramashram by road. Chinese President Xi visited Ahmedabad in 2014. There were pictures of Modi-Jinping swinging on a single swing on the riverfront.

Ahead of the US presidential election in November, this visit provides Trump the opportunity to woo the support of hundreds of thousands of Indian-American voters. Speaking at the White House on Tuesday, Trump also quoted Modi as saying “millions and millions of people” would attend the rally.

Whatever the situation may be but handling and hiding the truth like this way doesn’t seem viable. Better would have been if the houses of these people have been built from the same construction material instead of a wall or in reality the consistent poverty-ridden status of India has been demolished totally.

Continue Reading

Get more Headlines

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

Trending